Stone Age Tool Find

Acheulean is the name given

to an
archaeological industry of stone tool

manufacture associated with prehistoric
hominins during

the
Lower Paleolithic era across Africa and much of West Asia and Europe.  Acheulean tools are typically found with Homo erectus remains.


I picked this particular handaxe up on a public beach in

Cape Town.  One of the local experts said

that the find had no particular scientific value because the origin of the

artifact could never be determined.  Despite this expert opinion, removing it from South Africa would be illegal (subject to imprisonment).  So,

it will make a nice paperweight.  The

length is approximately 18cm and the handaxe is water-worn and smooth.

It was the dominant technology for the vast majority of
human history and

more than one million years ago it was Acheulean tool users
who left Africa to first successfully colonize
Eurasia.  Their distinctive oval and pear-shaped handaxes have
been found over a wide area and some examples attained a very high level of
sophistication suggesting that the roots of human art, economy and social
organization arose as a result of their development.  Although it developed in Africa, the industry
is named after the
type site of Saint Acheul,
now a suburb of
Amiens in northern France, where some of the first examples were identified in the nineteenth
century.

 

The Lower Paleolithic is the earliest subdivision

of the
Paleolithic or

Old
Stone Age.  It spans the time from around 2.5 million years ago

when the first evidence of craft and use of
stone tools by hominids

appears in the current
archaeological

record
, until around 100,000 years ago

when important evolutionary and technological changes (
behavioral modernity) ushered in the Middle Paleolithic.

The earliest hominids, known as australopithecines

(personified by the famous find of
Lucy by

Don Johansen (see recent photo of Don and Dr. Rebecca Rogers Ackermann) in
Ethiopia) were

not advanced
stone tool users

and were likely to have been common prey for larger animals.  Sometime before 3 million years ago the first
fossils that

may be called Homo appear in the archaeological record.  They may have evolved from the

australopithecines or come from another
phylogenetic

branch of the
primates.

Homo habilis

remains, such as those from
Olduvai Gorge, are

much more recognizable as humans.  Stone-tool

use was developed by these people around 2.5 million years ago before they were replaced by
Homo erectus about 1.5 million years ago.  Members of Homo habilis used Olduwan tools and had learned to control fire to support the hunter-gatherer method of subsistence.


Use-wear analysis

on Acheulean tools suggests there was generally no specialization in the

different types created and that they were multi-use implements.  Functions included hacking wood from a tree,

cutting animal carcasses as well as scraping and cutting hides when necessary.  Some tools may have been better suited to

digging roots or butchering animals than others however.

 

Alternative theories include a use for ovate hand-axes as
a kind of hunting
discus to be hurled at prey.  Puzzlingly, there are also examples of sites where hundreds of hand-axes, many
impractically large and also apparently unused, have been found in close
association together.  Sites such as Melka Kunturé
in
Ethiopia, Olorgesailie in Kenya, Isimila in Tanzania and Kalambo Falls
in
Zambia have
produced evidence that suggests Acheulean hand-axes may not always have had a
functional purpose.

 

Recently, it has been suggested that the Acheulean tool
users adopted the handaxe as a social artifact, meaning that it embodied
something beyond its function of a butchery or wood cutting tool.  Knowing how to create and use these tools
would have been a valuable skill and the more elaborate ones suggest that they
played a role in their owners’ identity and their interactions with others.  This would help explain the apparent
over-sophistication of some examples which may represent a “historically accrued
social significance”.

 

One theory goes further and suggests that some special
hand-axes were made and displayed by males in search of mate, using a large,
well-made hand-axe to demonstrate that they possessed sufficient strength and
skill to pass on to their offspring.  Once
they had attracted a female at a group gathering, it is suggested that they
would discard their axes, perhaps explaining why so many are found together.

 

** Most of
this text was extracted from
www.wikipedia.org where more information may be found.

submitted by Floyd Rogers

4 responses to “Stone Age Tool Find”

  1. Dianna Avatar
    Dianna

    Interesting that you found that arrowhead and the information surrounding it.
    Just read The Lost City of Z by David Grann and at the very end of the book he talks about how some indian tribes of the Amazon (Brazil) are still making and using arrows for hunting and how anthropologists and archeologists are learning info. from these tribes, which is helping to explain the cities of 10,000 years ago in the Amazon. A good read too!

  2. Kristen Watters Avatar

    This is good that tools from the past are seen because this can help us know their lifestyle before. I have observed that there are different shapes of stones which I believe has different functions too. Those stone aged men were very resourceful and intelligent people.

  3. Henrico Kumutu Avatar
    Henrico Kumutu

    Hi,
    Are there still people out there who collect Acheulian Stone Tools.
    Whe have found stone tools believed to be used and produced by Homo erectus.
    Please contact me

  4. floyd rogers Avatar
    floyd rogers

    Probably, but I would suggest contacting a museum or the Archaeology department of a nearby university. They could help you to determine the disposition of such a find.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Earth Science Club of Northern Illinois

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading